2016-02-03                     House Journal                      Page 1567
HB 126                                                                                                                        
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the February                                                            
1, 2016, calendar (page 1538), was read the third time:                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
    CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 126(JUD)                                                                                              
    "An Act relating to the administration of military justice; relating                                                        
    to the adoption of regulations by the adjutant general; relating to                                                         
    the authority of the adjutant general; relating to appeals of                                                               
    convictions and sentences of courts-martial; establishing the                                                               
    Military Appeals Commission; relating to the detention and                                                                  
    incarceration of members of the militia; relating to the jurisdiction                                                       
    of the supreme court over petitions from the Military Appeals                                                               
    Commission; relating to involuntary commitment for evaluation                                                               
    or treatment of a mental disease or defect before court-martial                                                             
    proceedings; relating to offenses subject to court-martial                                                                  
    proceedings; amending Rule 6, Alaska Rules of Criminal                                                                      
    Procedure; and providing for an effective date."                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB
(JUD) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of                                                              
considering Amendment No. 1.  There being no objection, it was so                                                               
ordered.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representatives Tuck and LeDoux:                                                                 
                                                                                                                                

2016-02-03                     House Journal                      Page 1568
Page 3, following line 17:                                                                                                      
    Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                            
         "(d)  The legislature may annul regulations adopted under this                                                         
    section by law."                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                      
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.  There being no objection, it was so                                                                
ordered.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 126(JUD) am pass the House?"                                                                   
The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 126(JUD) am                                                                                                                
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Final Passage                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  39   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara,                                                                
Gattis, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson,                                                                 
Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn,                                                                
Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler,                                                               
Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vazquez,                                                                
Wilson, Wool                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Olson                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
And so, CSHB 126(JUD) am passed the House.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                               
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                         
court rule change.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                               
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                         
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 126(JUD) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.